Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Packers Triumph in Superbowl XLV

Despite my Minnesota origins, I have a strong dislike for the Vikings. My Packer-supporting friends "converted" me to a Packer fan this year. As they saw it, I was already halfway there. I have to admit, it was a good year to support the Pack.


Trinity Packers fans celebrate the victory
The Green Bay Packers fans reigned victorious in the XLV Super Bowl on Feb. 6, winning 31-25 against the Pittsburgh Steelers, leaving Packers fans in a state of euphoria and Steelers fans downcast. 


The game began at 5:30 CT, with Christina Aguilera singing the national anthem, and accidentally singing the line "what so proudly we watched, at the twilight’s last gleaming" twice during the song. Though the Packers were ahead the entire game, the closest the Steelers came was 28-25. This caused many Packers fans feeling nervous for the outcome, as the Steelers have been known to pull ahead near the end of a game.


"I thought the game was going to be close before the game [started]. It looked like the Packers were going to win with ease, but then with those key defensive injuries, the Steelers made it a close game," junior Eric Anderson said. Anderson is from Green Bay and has avidly kept up with the Packers this season. In addition to the victory, many Packers fans alike were pleased to see Aaron Rodgers win the Most Valuable Player award.

Over 40 students watched the game from first floor Trinity Hall at a campus party hosted by Resident Assistant Ethan Carlson and the residents on his floor. The event had the essentials that would make any Super Bowl party a success: a flat screen TV, food, and even classic party games like Baggo Bag Toss.

Other Trinity students were not as interested in the game. Senior Josh Harrison has never watched a Super Bowl in his life, and chose to keep that tradition by leaving a Super Bowl party before the game started.

The Black Eyed Peas performed at the halftime show, with two unexpected appearances from the musical artists Slash and Usher. Judging by the Trinity Hall party goers, the show was a disappointment possibly due to the auto tuning that is usually applied to the recorded music, but was lacking during the live performance.

Viewers that watched the Super Bowl solely for the commercials may have been dissatisfied as well. Many commercials were repeated, specifically commercials about Verizon adopting the iPhone.

Symphonic Band Director Stephen Posegate was surprised at the amount of violence the commercials contained. Anderson said while the commercials displayed an interesting portrait of what is going on in our world, they weren’t particularly entertaining to watch.

Following the game, Packers fans rejoiced around campus tooting blow horns and cheering loudly making it known that the Packers fan population on campus was large and electrified.

A Look at Controversial Literature

This is an article published for the Trinity Digest, on February 4, 2011. Editor Garrett Kling actually came up with the idea after we discussed it in our Literary Theory class. 

As “A Brave New World” graces Trinity’s stage this spring, students attending the play will be confronted with a controversial work of literature that is adapted for the stage. 
Photo from Bethany Kemming

Associate Professor of English and Theatre Director Kristin Lindholm encourages students not to misinterpret “A Brave New World,” as the author Aldous Huxley wanted the audience to reject the message that the characters embrace through their immoral actions and disheartening beliefs, not embrace it.   

According to Lindholm, the theatre department will be partnering with the Center for Bioethics and Human Dignity to host an event before “A Brave New World” to discuss the play and its message.  

Misinterpreting controversial literature is not distant from the Christian community. Every few years a book or movie comes out that many Christians find highly controversial.  The Golden Compass, The Harry Potter series, The Da Vinci Code, and many others have all sparked conversation and differing interpretations.   

Books such as “What’s a Christian to Do With Harry Potter?” and articles like “The Good in the Golden Compass” from RelevantMagazine, frequently pop up among the Christian market, implying that Christians shouldn’t ignore books like these, but rather read and interpret them.  

It can be difficult for Christians to determine where theline should be drawn about what is worthy of study and what to avoid. According to Lindholm, many Christians initially rejected the Harry Potter series, but eventually “talked their way around” the series, and it is popular among many Christians today. Many see Harry Potter as a Christ figure, while others ban their children from reading the book based on its inclusion of wizardry and witchcraft in a positive light. 

Students that have taken American Literature II at Trinity have encountered a “classic” but controversial title, “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn.”  The novel has been controversial among many literary communities, not just the Christian community, because of the racism in the novel and use of derogatory terms. Senior Hannah Held said she found class discussion helpful in interpreting the novel.  

“I was able to look at the book in light of what it could reveal about racism, rather than simply condemning the book as part of the problem of racism,” Held said.  

According to Lindholm, Trinity does not have an official policy on what literature can be chosen as part of class curriculum.  The plays and musicals, however, do have to go through a review process.  

Held said it can be beneficial to discuss a controversial work respectfully and maturely as part of coursework for a class discussion.   

“The context is of utmost importance in a situation like that,” Held said.   

Held also believes that Christians should know the boundaries of their beliefs and make decisions with the aid of research, prayer, and an individual that will hold them accountable and make sure they do not read “unconsciously,” without thinking about the issues. 

Lindholm said the arena of controversial literature is an opportunity for Christians to follow Paul’s admonition in Romans 14 to not be a stumbling block for others and seek that which is edifying.  Christians need to be wise and careful about their judgments.  

“There are standards.  Not everything is worth reading,” Lindholm said.

Lindholm maintains personal standards for deciding what’s appropriate to read and study.  Evil must be shown to be evil, and not glorified. Lindholm also believes that if a Christian is seeing negative effects in their life because of a book, they should stop reading.   

Senior Amanda Krup works with junior high students, and said she finds it helpful to read some of what they are reading to help them find the good elements in the literature, as well as point out the unhealthy aspects.   

Krup said readers should keep the genre of what they are reading in mind, and find the good or entertainment in what they choose to read. 

“The [controversial books] that I have read are just like anything else in life and need to be looked at with a godly world view,” Krup said.